1966 Holden EH vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH.
Because 2010 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | EH | Titan |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3560 mm |