1966 Holden EH vs. 2012 Audi A5
To start off, 2012 Audi A5 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A5 (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A5 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 2012 Audi A5 | |
Make | Holden | Audi |
Model | EH | A5 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |