1966 Holden EH vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL

To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 950 kg more than 1966 Holden EH.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL (900 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 663 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH. 1966 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL has manual transmission. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Holden EH 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL
Make Holden Mercedes-Benz
Model EH CL
Year Released 1966 2013
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2930 cc 5500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 0 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 237 Nm 900 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 3750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Vehicle Weight 1185 kg 2135 kg
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 5106 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 2139 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1426 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2955 mm