1966 Holden HD vs. 1970 ZAZ 966

To start off, 1970 ZAZ 966 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1970 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 1970 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 460 kg more than 1970 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 ZAZ 966.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Holden HD 1970 ZAZ 966
Make Holden ZAZ
Model HD 966
Year Released 1966 1970
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2930 cc 887 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 122 HP 27 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 237 Nm 52 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1200 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 4580 mm 3740 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1540 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2170 mm