1966 Holden HD vs. 1974 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 1974 Datsun 260Z is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Datsun 260Z (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 100 kg more than 1974 Datsun 260Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Datsun 260Z.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 1974 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Holden | Datsun |
Model | HD | 260Z |
Year Released | 1966 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 213 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4135 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2310 mm |