1966 Holden HD vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (172 Nm @ 4 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | HD | Celeste |
Year Released | 1966 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2350 mm |