1966 Holden HD vs. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara
To start off, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 3,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. (81 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | |
Make | Holden | Monteverdi |
Model | HD | Sahara |
Year Released | 1966 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 3253 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |