1966 Holden HD vs. 1984 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1984 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 1984 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 1984 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
Model | HD | Camaro |
Year Released | 1966 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2580 mm |