1966 Holden HD vs. 1985 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1985 Toyota Cressida is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 122 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 114 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Toyota Cressida. (142 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Toyota Cressida.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 1985 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | HD | Cressida |
Year Released | 1966 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2759 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1314 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2670 mm |