1966 Holden HD vs. 1987 Acura Integra
To start off, 1987 Acura Integra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Acura Integra (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 1987 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Holden | Acura |
| Model | HD | Integra |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4285 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2450 mm |
