1966 Holden HD vs. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 100 kg more than 1987 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | HD | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1966 | 1987 |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1451 cc |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1910 mm |