1966 Holden HD vs. 1990 Isuzu Impulse
To start off, 1990 Isuzu Impulse is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Isuzu Impulse (160 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Isuzu Impulse should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Isuzu Impulse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Isuzu Impulse. (203 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Isuzu Impulse.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 1990 Isuzu Impulse | |
Make | Holden | Isuzu |
Model | HD | Impulse |
Year Released | 1966 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2460 mm |