1966 Holden HD vs. 1991 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1991 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1991 Toyota 4Runner. (112 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 1991 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 400 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1991 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Toyota 4Runner. (192 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | HD | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1966 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |