1966 Holden HD vs. 1995 Lada Niva
To start off, 1995 Lada Niva is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (63 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Lada Niva weights approximately 40 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (118 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 1995 Lada Niva | |
Make | Holden | Lada |
Model | HD | Niva |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2210 mm |