1966 Holden HD vs. 1996 Honda Civic

To start off, 1996 Honda Civic is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda Civic (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda Civic weights approximately 10 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda Civic. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda Civic.

Compare all specifications: