1966 Holden HD vs. 1998 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1998 Jaguar XK is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XK (445 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 323 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XK weights approximately 365 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XK (615 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 1998 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | HD | XK |
Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 445 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 615 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1140 mm |