1966 Holden HD vs. 1999 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1999 Fiat Siena is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1999 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 1999 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Fiat Siena weights approximately 100 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 1999 Fiat Siena | |
| Make | Holden | Fiat |
| Model | HD | Siena |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1910 cc |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1300 kg |
