1966 Holden HD vs. 1999 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1999 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 122 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 195 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1999 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Jeep Wrangler. (193 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 1999 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | HD | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2463 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 193 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1395 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |
