1966 Holden HD vs. 1999 Mazda AZ
To start off, 1999 Mazda AZ is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 450 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 1999 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | HD | AZ |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2370 mm |
