1966 Holden HD vs. 1999 Noble M10
To start off, 1999 Noble M10 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Noble M10 (168 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Noble M10 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 240 kg more than 1999 Noble M10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Noble M10. (220 Nm). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Noble M10.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 1999 Noble M10 | |
| Make | Holden | Noble |
| Model | HD | M10 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1170 mm |
