1966 Holden HD vs. 2001 Suzuki SX
To start off, 2001 Suzuki SX is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Suzuki SX (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Suzuki SX weights approximately 336 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2001 Suzuki SX | |
Make | Holden | Suzuki |
Model | HD | SX |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1298 cc |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1536 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2460 mm |