1966 Holden HD vs. 2002 Honda Civic
To start off, 2002 Honda Civic is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Civic (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 86 kg more than 2002 Honda Civic.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Civic. (153 Nm). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2002 Honda Civic | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | HD | Civic |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1667 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1114 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2750 mm |