1966 Holden HD vs. 2002 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2002 Mazda B2500 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2002 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 2002 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda B2500. (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2002 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | HD | B2500 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2990 mm |
