1966 Holden HD vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 204 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | HD | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1404 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |