1966 Holden HD vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 529 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Holden | Lincoln |
| Model | HD | LS |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 3933 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 280 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1729 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2910 mm |
