1966 Holden HD vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B3000 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B3000 (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | HD | B3000 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3200 mm |
