1966 Holden HD vs. 2004 MG TF
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG TF (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 10 kg more than 2004 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG TF. (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2004 MG TF | |
Make | Holden | MG |
Model | HD | TF |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |