1966 Holden HD vs. 2004 Samsung SM5
To start off, 2004 Samsung SM5 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 122 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Samsung SM5 weights approximately 126 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Samsung SM5. (162 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Samsung SM5.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2004 Samsung SM5 | |
Make | Holden | Samsung |
Model | HD | SM5 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1838 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |