1966 Holden HD vs. 2005 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2005 Honda CR-V is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Honda CR-V (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Honda CR-V weights approximately 220 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Honda CR-V. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2005 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | HD | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1420 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2540 mm |
