1966 Holden HD vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 664 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | HD | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2774 cc |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 147 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1864 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
