1966 Holden HD vs. 2005 Kia Rio
To start off, 2005 Kia Rio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Rio (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 256 kg more than 2005 Kia Rio.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Rio. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2005 Kia Rio | |
| Make | Holden | Kia |
| Model | HD | Rio |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1341 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 944 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2420 mm |
