1966 Holden HD vs. 2005 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2005 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Suzuki XL7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2005 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Holden | Suzuki |
Model | HD | XL7 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2810 mm |