1966 Holden HD vs. 2005 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2005 Toyota Camry is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Camry (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 280 kg more than 2005 Toyota Camry.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Camry. (218 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2005 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | HD | Camry |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2360 cc |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 920 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |