1966 Holden HD vs. 2005 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2005 Toyota MR2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota MR2 (190 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 208 kg more than 2005 Toyota MR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota MR2. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2005 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | HD | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 992 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2440 mm |
