1966 Holden HD vs. 2006 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2006 Toyota RunX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 90 kg more than 2006 Toyota RunX.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2006 Toyota RunX | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | HD | RunX |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
