1966 Holden HD vs. 2007 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2007 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Tundra (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Toyota Tundra (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2007 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2007 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | HD | Tundra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3710 mm |