1966 Holden HD vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 237 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | HD | Epica |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |