1966 Holden HD vs. 2008 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 570 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 2008 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2008 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Holden | Land Rover |
Model | HD | Freelander |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2670 mm |