1966 Holden HD vs. 2008 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 136 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2008 Mazda Etude | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | HD | Etude |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1595 cc |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1064 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |
