1966 Holden HD vs. 2009 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2009 Lotus Elise is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Elise (219 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 319 kg more than 2009 Lotus Elise.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lotus Elise. (212 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lotus Elise.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2009 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | HD | Elise |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 219 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 212 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 881 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2310 mm |