1966 Holden HD vs. 2009 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2009 Mazda B4000 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 4,034 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 20 kg more than 2009 Mazda B4000.
Because 2009 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda B4000 (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2009 Mazda B4000 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | HD | B4000 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 4034 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 323 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3200 mm |
