1966 Holden HD vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (262 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 135 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Holden | Suzuki |
Model | HD | Equator |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3560 mm |