1966 Holden HD vs. 2010 Honda Jazz

To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2010 Honda Jazz. (77 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 152 kg more than 2010 Honda Jazz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Holden HD 2010 Honda Jazz
Make Holden Honda
Model HD Jazz
Year Released 1966 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2930 cc 1245 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 122 HP 77 HP
Torque 237 Nm 110 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1200 kg 1048 kg
Vehicle Length 4580 mm 3840 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2460 mm