1966 Holden HD vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 375 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Holden | Kia |
| Model | HD | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 290 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2845 mm |
