1966 Holden HD vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 766 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | HD | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2875 mm |