1966 Holden HD vs. 2012 Honda Civic
To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2012 Honda Civic. (113 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Civic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda Civic weights approximately 120 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Civic. (148 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2012 Honda Civic | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | HD | Civic |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Natural Gas (CNG) |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1320 kg |