1966 Holden HD vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 30 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | HD | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |
