1966 Holden HD vs. 2012 Renault Wind
To start off, 2012 Renault Wind is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Wind weights approximately 6 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Wind, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2012 Renault Wind | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | HD | Wind |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3822 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1698 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2368 mm |