1966 Holden HD vs. 2013 Bentley Mulsane

To start off, 2013 Bentley Mulsane is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 6,752 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Bentley Mulsane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Bentley Mulsane (505 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 383 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Bentley Mulsane should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Bentley Mulsane weights approximately 1385 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Bentley Mulsane (1,020 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 783 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Bentley Mulsane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Holden HD 2013 Bentley Mulsane
Make Holden Bentley
Model HD Mulsane
Year Released 1966 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2930 cc 6752 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 122 HP 505 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 237 Nm 1020 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1200 kg 2585 kg
Vehicle Length 4580 mm 5575 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 2208 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1521 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 3266 mm