1966 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1966 Isuzu Bellel is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 502 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (159 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1963 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Isuzu Bellel | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Isuzu | Reliant |
Model | Bellel | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1966 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 159 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 798 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 38 L |